The making of a mind
21 Jul 01
Schizophrenia can't be cured, but it might be prevented if we
can figure out what's behind one of the biggest risk factors, A
spring birthday. Bryant Furlow reports
IT HITS in early adulthood. At first, the mistrustfulness and
increasingly mercurial outbursts are dismissed by loved ones as a mere
passing youthful "phase". But all too soon comes full-blown psychosis,
that mental schism with reality that is schizophrenia.
Parents watch in horror as their son or daughter lurches into paranoid
delusions, verbal incoherence and hallucinations. It all seems unfairly
sudden. An ambush. In fact, it is a nightmare that has been years in
the making.
Even as toddlers, people with schizophrenia tend to be clumsier than
normal, and to be slow to talk. When they are eventually diagnosed
with the disease years later, they are often found to have a curious
brain structure-their ventricles, the fluid-filled cavities, can be up
to
30 per cent larger than usual, while the regions of the cortex that
deal with memory, language and planning are smaller. Surprisingly,
however, their brains have none of the scars or "gliosis" that you
would expect to see if those changes had happened during adulthood.
Those findings and others have convinced many experts that the
brain abnormalities that lead to schizophrenia must come about very
early in development, most likely before birth, as the very scaffold of
the infant's brain is being built.
And that realisation has reignited interest in a bizarre observation
dating back to the 1920s. In Europe and North America, there's a
mid-March peak in "schizophrenic births"-babies who grow up to
develop schizophrenia. Up to 10 per cent more are born between
February and April than in any other three-month period of the year.
That might not sound like a lot, but with an estimated 60 million cases
of schizophrenia worldwide, a 10 per cent seasonal increase
represents a huge amount of additional suffering. What's more, most
studies suggest that season of birth accounts for more cases of
schizophrenia than almost any other known risk factor-including a
person's genetic heritage. The only risk factor worse than a spring
birth is being born in a city.
Solve the riddle of what extra insult is being added during pregnancy
to the mishmash of genes and environmental factors, say
schizophrenia researchers, and you'll be well on your way to
understanding what underpins the disease itself.
Now, an Australian psychiatrist believes he has cracked it. According
to John McGrath of the Queensland Centre for Schizophrenia Research
in Brisbane, all the evidence suggests that a lack of UV light during
pregnancy is the key to the spring peak in schizophrenic births. If his
controversial hunch is right, we may one day be able to stop
schizophrenia in the womb, before it begins. And we might, just might,
be able to do it with nothing more sophisticated than vitamin
supplements or a sunlamp.
"[The] idea would have been dismissed as too outlandish by most
people, if it didn't offer the intriguing possibility of explaining
epidemiological facts that at present, we cannot explain," says Robert
Kendell, a psychiatrist at Edinburgh University. "It's a long shot. But
long shots with high [potential] rewards are worth taking seriously."
And if ever a disease needed a big break, schizophrenia does. Despite
decades of intensive research, a cure for schizophrenia is nowhere
near. True, a third of patients respond well to drugs designed to
alleviate the worst of the symptoms, although even these patients
may still occasionally slip into the overwhelming, incoherent world of
psychosis. But another third of patients respond only moderately well
to drugs, and the rest don't respond at all. For these unlucky people,
holding down a job can be impossible. All too often they end up
homeless, neglected, and estranged from their families.
"We're just desperate to figure this out," says McGrath, "We've got to
find the cause, we've got to focus on prevention."
Long before UV light became a contender, the prime suspect for the
spring peak in schizophrenic births was some sort of an infectious
agent-perhaps something as common as flu. For March-born babies,
the flu season falls squarely in the middle of their mothers'
pregnancies, which is just when the main architecture of the brain is
being laid down. What's more, major flu pandemics, like the one in
1957, are sometimes followed by spikes in schizophrenic births. The
"flu hypothesis" could even explain why proportionally more people
with schizophrenia are born in towns than in the country since flu
spreads more easily in the hustle of the city.
One study by Alan Brown's team at Columbia University in New York
has even found that pregnant women who catch respiratory infections
during their second trimester-be it bronchitis, flu or tuberculosis-are
more likely to have offspring who develop either schizophrenia or a
number of milder, but related, mental illnesses such as paranoid
personality disorder.
In short, the flu hypothesis had become something of an
epidemiological gospel. So it came as a bit of a surprise when a new
study dealt it a severe blow just two years ago.
Then, in the biggest study of its type to date, a team led by
psychologists Yusef Battle and Stephen Miller of the University of
Georgia in Athens examined the health records of nearly
three-quarters of a million people born in the state of Georgia
between 1948 and 1965. They confirmed the spring peak, but found
no relationship between flu infection rates in the population in a given
year and the number of schizophrenic births. "We were somewhat
surprised not to find a flu effect," admits Miller.
McGrath was not. "Flu is looking very dodgy," he says. "The whole
area of seasonality of birth needs a fresh approach."
Take a close look at studies on schizophrenia and the season of birth,
says McGrath, and you'd find plenty of other reasons to mistrust the
flu hypothesis. For a start, in the northern hemisphere, the precise
timing and size of the spring peak varies from year to year, even
though the flu season tends not to. And a study from Brazil has found
that rainfall is a better predictor of schizophrenic births than the flu
season: they peak roughly three months after the rainy season even
though it rarely coincides with the flu season.
Then there are McGrath's own studies. In Queensland, there's a peak
in schizophrenic births every three or four years. Those peaks don't
coincide with big flu outbreaks, but they do seem to occur at the
same frequency at which the El NiÑo weather system periodically
casts a temporary gloom over the Sunshine State. And while
proponents of the flu hypothesis tend to assume that the seasonal
pattern of births is the same the world over, it isn't. For sure, some
studies have found a seasonal effect in southern hemisphere countries
like Australia and South Africa, but others have not. When McGrath
and Joy Welham, a psychologist and epidemiologist who also works at
the Queensland Centre for Schizophrenia Research, pooled all the
data, they found no overall seasonal variation in schizophrenic births
in the southern hemisphere-even though all the countries in the study
did have an annual flu season (Schizophrenia Research, vol 35, p
237).
"For days, I racked my brains trying to figure out why," says McGrath.
"Whatever [the environmental insult] was, you were getting a bigger
dose of it in the northern hemisphere." A cursory glance at a map of
the world gives one clue-latitude.
In the southern hemisphere, people tend to live closer to the equator
than in the northern hemisphere. "To reach the latitudes inhabited by
northern Europeans," says McGrath, "you have to go to the southern
tip of South America." When McGrath and Welham pooled data from
170,000 people with schizophrenia living in the northern hemisphere,
the seasonal peak in schizophrenic births grew bigger the further
north they went.
Taken with the other curious epidemiological observations, "that just
screams out to us that it has something to do with ultraviolet light",
says McGrath. At higher latitudes UV light has to travel further
through the atmosphere before it hits the Earth-in other words, the
changes in UV light mirror the way the spring birth peak varies with
latitude.
Differences in UV light could explain the lack of a seasonal birth effect
in the southern hemisphere, says McGrath. Besides the fact that
people tend to live closer to the equator on that side of the world,
the southern hemisphere also gets about 15 per cent more UV light
than equivalent latitudes in the north, thanks to a combination of
factors, including the relative lack of pollution and the position of the
Earth relative to the Sun. A lack of UV light could even explain those
bizarre correlations between schizophrenic births, Brazilian rainfall,
and
the El NiÑo effect in Queensland: rain means cloud, and cloud soaks
up UV like a sponge.
The next question was how a lack of UV light could so alter the
course of a baby's development that years later she would develop a
disease as devastating as schizophrenia. Besides giving you a tan, UV
light has another major impact on the body-it converts a
cholesterol-like molecule in the skin to vitamin D.
At first glance, vitamin D, best know for its role in building healthy
bones, seems like a feeble candidate for triggering a brain disease. But
the circumstantial evidence compelled McGrath to take a second look.
It turns out that a surprisingly large number of women are deficient in
vitamin D-about 12 per cent among 20 to 39-year-olds, according to
a large US survey. What's more, harking back to that urban birth risk
factor for schizophrenia, city women are more likely to be vitamin D
deficient than their country cousins. Finally, Afro-Caribbean
immigrants to England and Surinamese immigrants to Holland have
between three and four times the number of schizophrenic births than
other populations in the same areas-and because of their dark skin,
they are more likely to run low on vitamin D.
"Vitamin D is low in winter, low in cities, and low in dark-skinned
migrants to northern climates," says McGrath.
And it's not just McGrath who finds the UV light hypothesis strangely
compelling. "It's an exciting proposition. He's coming at [the problem]
from a completely new angle," says Jayashri Kulkarni, a psychiatrist at
the Dandenong Psychiatry Research Centre in Melbourne. "If
McGrath's theory is true," adds Kendell, "it would explain these
epidemiological facts that currently have no plausible explanation."
Still, that's a big "if". For the theory to be correct, vitamin D would
have to play some key role in early brain development. Here the
evidence starts to thin out. What is known is that in the developing
brain, receptors for vitamin D pack the areas where cells are
multiplying, including parts that are wrongly wired in schizophrenia.
And although nobody knows exactly what vitamin D might be doing
there, there are more than a few tantalising hints that it's something
to do with brain development.
In a lab flask, vitamin D prods glial cells-the brain's support cells-into
making nerve growth factor. NGF plays a pivotal role in shaping the
developing brain. Then there's the growing evidence that vitamin D
and vitamin A get together in the cell's nucleus to turn genes on and
off-a process that is key to the development of any tissue.
Still, the connection between UV light, vitamin D and schizophrenia
would have been relegated to the Annals of Untested Hypotheses had
it not been for some astounding new results from McGrath's lab,
announced this April at an international schizophrenia meeting in
Canada.
When McGrath and developmental neurobiologist Alan Mackay-Sim
from Griffith University in Brisbane deprived pregnant rats of UV light
or vitamin D in their food, the brains of their offspring contained less
NGF than normal. What's more, they looked suspiciously like the brains
of people with schizophrenia: the baby rats had enlarged ventricles.
"We were shocked that the effect was so large," says McGrath.
McGrath is quick to point out the rats were far more deficient in
vitamin D than the vast majority of pregnant women, and that not all
the abnormalities in the rodent brains mirror what you find in
schizophrenia. Still the study made a point: vitamin D is crucial for
normal brain development.
What McGrath and Mackay-Sim need to find out now is whether mild
to moderate vitamin D deficiency will also alter brain development in
lab animals. Clearly, in certain circumstances mild vitamin deficiencies
can be disastrous for developing babies-witness folic acid. Children
with spina bifida are rarely born to mothers who have an obvious
deficiency. Nonetheless, folic acid supplements for pregnant women is
one of public health's greatest success stories, slashing the incidence
of the disease in industrialised countries.
The causes of schizophrenia are probably more complex than those
underlying neural tube defects like spina bifida. Nonetheless,
McGrath's dream is that vitamin D supplements for pregnant women
or even sunlamps will one day slash the incidence of schizophrenia,
just as folic acid has driven down spina bifida cases. However, too
much vitamin D can cause birth defects, so McGrath cautions
pregnant women not to take supplements until such a treatment has
been shown to be effective and the safe dose has been worked out.
But although the rat study provides the most promising support to
date for the idea that a lack of UV light and vitamin D in pregnancy
may predispose a fetus to schizophrenia, the flu hypothesis hasn't yet
bitten the dust-far from it.
"The vitamin D hypothesis is not incompatible with the infection
hypothesis," says Brown. "Each could theoretically explain a certain
proportion of schizophrenia cases." Brown and his colleagues are now
screening prenatal blood samples banked by hospitals in the US
between 1950 and 1970 for evidence of respiratory infections in
mothers whose babies developed schizophrenia when they grew up.
Meanwhile, McGrath has joined forces with epidemiologist Steve Buka
of Harvard University and paediatric virologist Bob Yolken of Johns
Hopkins University in Baltimore. Together, they plan to search samples
from the same collection for evidence of vitamin D deficiency.
Not only does the solution to a 70-year-old mystery hang on the
results of those two studies, but the hope that schizophrenia, one of
the world's most remorseless mental disorders, may one day be
preventable.
Further reading:
The impact of low prenatal vitamin D on brain development:
using an animal model to examine the vitamin D hypothesis
of schizophrenia by John McGrath and others, Schizophrenia
Research, vol 49, p 48 (2001)
Climate, geography and the search for candidate nongenetic
risk factors for schizophrenia by Joy Welham and others,
International Journal of Mental Health, vol 29, p 79 (2000).
Schizophrenia and season of birth in a tropical region:
relationship to rainfall by Erick de Messias and others,
Schizophrenia Research, vol 48, p 227 (2001)
Bryant Furlow is a science writer based in California
From New Scientist magazine, vol 171 issue 2300, 21/07/2001, page
38
© Copyright New Scientist, RBI Limited 2001